Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
How to install the library or the Symfony bundle?
This framework contains several sub-packages that you don’t necessarily need. It is highly recommended to install what you need and not the whole framework.
The preferred way to install the library you need is to use composer:
For 4.8.0+, the following dependencies ar recommended and will be mandatory for 5.0.0
symfony/serializer
symfony/property-access
symfony/property-info
phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock
If you use Symfony Framework, you may be interested in the bundle and, optionally, the Stimulus component.
Hereafter the dependency tree:
web-auth/webauthn-lib
: this is the core library. This package can be used in any PHP project or within any popular framework (Laravel, CakePHP…)
web-auth/webauthn-symfony-bundle
: this is a Symfony bundle that ease the integration of this authentication mechanism in your Symfony project.
The core library also depends on web-auth/cose-lib
and web-auth/metadata-service
. What are these dependencies?
web-auth/cose-lib
contains several cipher algorithms and COSE key support to verify the digital signatures sent by the authenticators during the creation and authentication ceremonies. These algorithms are compliant with the RFC8152. This library can be used by any other PHP projects. At the moment only signature algorithms are available, but it is planned to add encryption algorithms.
web-auth/metadata-service
provides classes to support the Fido Alliance Metadata Service. If you plan to use Attestation Statements during the creation ceremony, this service is mandatory. Please note that Attestation Statements decreases the user privacy as they may leak data that allow to identify a specific user. The use of Attestation Statements and this service are generally not recommended unless you REALLY need this information. This library can also be used by any other PHP projects.
Seamless Integration with PHP Applications: Our Webauthn Documentation and Tutorials
Welcome to WebAuthn, the solution for strong authentication on the web. With WebAuthn, you can offer your users a secure, simple, and convenient authentication experience that seamlessly integrates with your PHP or Symfony application.
At Spomky-Labs, we are committed to making the web safer for all users. We provide free, libre, and open-source libraries and a Symfony bundle to help you implement strong authentication solutions for your websites and applications.
WebAuthn is an open-source technology developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and is compatible with all modern web browsers. With WebAuthn and PHP, you can offer your users secure authentication without requiring them to remember complex passwords or provide sensitive personal information.
WebAuthn is supported by the FIDO Alliance, an organization working to promote open and interoperable strong authentication standards. You can learn more about the FIDO Alliance by visiting their website at https://fidoalliance.org/.
Explore our documentation to learn more about WebAuthn and how it can help you implement strong authentication in your PHP or Symfony application.
You have just found a bug?
First of all, thank you for contributing.
Bugs or feature requests can be posted online on the GitHub issues section of the project.
Few rules to ease code reviews and merges:
You MUST follow the PSR-12 for coding standards.
You MUST use the PSR-20 to get the time.
You MUST run the test suite (see below).
You MUST write (or update) tests when bugs are fixed or features are added.
You SHOULD write documentation.
We use the following branching workflow:
Each minor version has a dedicated branch (e.g. 1.1.x
, 1.2.x
, 2.0.x
, 2.1.x
…)
The default branch is set to the last minor version (e.g. v2.1.x).
Please select the correct branch when submitting a PR
If it is a bug fix, please use the version first major release (1.0.x
, 2.0.x
, 3.0.x
...)
If it is a new feature, please use the last minor release
To contribute use Pull Requests, please, write commit messages that make sense, and rebase your branch before submitting your PR.
install composer: curl -s http://getcomposer.org/installer | php
install dependencies: php composer.phar install
run tests: vendor/bin/phpunit
Overview of the framework
Webauthn defines an API enabling the creation and use of strong, attested, scoped, public key-based credentials by web applications, for the purpose of strongly authenticating users.
The complete specification can be found on the W3C dedicated page.
This framework contains PHP libraries and Symfony bundle to allow developers to integrate that authentication mechanism into their web applications.
Naming things may be complicated. That’s why the following rule applies on the whole framework: the name of classes, constants and properties are identical to the ones you will find in the specification.
As an example, the section 5.2.2 “Web Authentication Assertion” shows an object named AuthenticatorAssertionResponse
that extends AuthenticatorResponse
with the following properties:
authenticatorData
signature
userHandle
You will find EXACTLY the same structure in the PHP class provided by the library.
Attestation Types
Empty
Basic
Self
Private CA
Anonymization CA
Note that Elliptic Curve Direct Anonymous Attestation (ECDAA) is deprecated and not supported
Attestation Formats
FIDO U2F
Packed
TPM
Android Key
Android Safetynet (deprecated)
Apple
Cose Algorithms
RS1, RS256, RS384, RS512
PS256, PS384, PS512
ES256, ES256K, ES384, ES512
ED25519
Extensions
Supported (not fully tested)
appid extension (compatibility with FIDO U2F authenticator
The Token Binding support feature is now deprecated as not part of the latest specification version
As of January 2023, our framework supports every authenticator with full feature and algorithm support, achieving a 100% success rate across all tests. Official FIDO Alliance testing tools have validated its compliance.
We ensure continuous conformity through rigorous unit and functional testing throughout the development process.
I bring solutions to your problems and answer your questions.
If you really love that project, and the work I have done or if you want I prioritize your issues, then you can help me out for a couple of🍻 or more!
Requests for new features, bug fixed and all other ideas to make this framework useful are welcome.
If you feel comfortable writing code, you could try to fix opened issues where help is wanted or those that are easy to fix.
Do not forget to follow these best practices.
If you think you have found a security issue, DO NOT open an issue. You MUST submit your issue here.
What is an authenticator?
An Authenticator is a cryptographic entity used to generate a public key credential and registered by a Relying Party (i.e. an application). This public key is used to authenticate by potentially verifying a user in the form of an authentication assertion and other data.
Authenticators may have additional features such as PIN code or biometric sensors (fingerprint, facial recognition…) that offer user verification.
The roaming authenticator may have different forms. The most common form is a USB device the user plugs into its computer. It can be a paired Bluetooth device or a card with NFC capabilities.
Authenticators of this class are removable from, and can "roam" among, client devices.
A platform authenticator is usually not removable from the client device. For example an Android smartphone or a Windows 10 computer with the associated security chips can act as an authenticator.
Adoption by web browsers
Webauthn is now supported by all main web browsers:
Mozilla Firefox 60+ and Firefox for Android 68+
Google Chrome 67+
Microsoft EDGE 18+ and Microsoft EDGE Chromium 79+
Opera 54+
Safari 13+ and iOS Safari 13.3+
Android Browser 76+
For more information and limitation on these browsers, please have a look at the following page:
This page is about an advanced feature. You can skip it if you are new with Webauthn
The mechanism for generating public key credentials, as well as requesting and generating Authentication assertions, can be extended to suit particular use cases. Each case is addressed by defining a registration extension.
Standard extensions are usually listed in the dedicated IANA Registry available at https://www.iana.org/assignments/webauthn/webauthn.xhtml
This library is ready to handle extension inputs and outputs, but no concrete implementations are provided, except for the appid
extension.
It is up to you, depending on the extensions you want to support, to create the extension handlers.
Registration and Authentication process overview
In the Webauthn context, there are two ceremonies:
The attestation ceremony or creation ceremony: associates an authenticator to a user account
The assertion ceremony or request ceremony: used for the authentication of a user.
For both ceremonies, there are two steps to perform:
The creation of options: these options are sent to the authenticator and indicate what to do and how.
The response of the authenticator: after the user interacted with the authenticator, the authenticator computes a response that has to be verified.
Depending on the options and the capabilities of the authenticator, the user interaction may differ. It can be a simple touch on a button or a complete authentication using biometric means (PIN code, fingerprint, facial recognition…).
This ceremony aims at registering an authenticator. It can be used during the creation of a new user account or when an existing user wants to add an additional authenticator.
This ceremony aims at authenticating a user. The user will be asked to interact with one of its authenticators. Additional authentication means, such as PIN code or fingerprint, may be required.
Prove to me who you claim to be!
User verification may be instigated through various authorization gesture modalities: a touch plus PIN code, password entry, or biometric recognition (presenting a fingerprint). The intent is to be able to distinguish individual users.
Eligible authenticators are filtered and only capable of satisfying this requirement will interact with the user.
Possible user verification values are:
required
: this value indicates that the application requires user verification for the operation and will fail the operation if the response does not have the UV
flag set.
preferred
: this value indicates that the application prefers user verification for the operation if possible, but will not fail the operation if the response does not have the UV
flag set.
discouraged
: this value indicates that the application does not want user verification employed during the operation (e.g.,in the interest of minimizing disruption to the user interaction flow).
Public constants are provided by AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria
.
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::USER_VERIFICATION_REQUIREMENT_REQUIRED
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::USER_VERIFICATION_REQUIREMENT_PREFERRED
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::USER_VERIFICATION_REQUIREMENT_DISCOURAGED
aka the application you are interacting with
The Relying Party (or rp
) corresponds to the application that will ask for the user to interact with the authenticator.
The library provides a simple class to handle the rp information: Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialRpEntity
.
This $rpEntity
object will be useful for the next steps.
In the example above, we created a simple relying party object with it’s name. The relying party may also have an ID that corresponds to the domain applicable for that rp
. By default, the relying party ID is null
i.e. the current domain will be used.
It may be useful to specify the rp
ID, especially if your application has several sub-domains. The rp ID can be set during the creation of the object as 2nd constructor parameter.
Even if it is optional, we highly recommend setting the application ID
The rp
ID shall be the domain of the application without the scheme, userinfo, port, path, user…. IP addresses are not allowed either.
Allowed: www.sub.domain.com
, sub.domain.com
, domain.com
Not allowed:
www.sub.domain.com:1337
, https://domain.com:443
, sub.domain.com/index
, https://user:password@www.domain.com
.
12.65.76.43
or [2001:db8:85a3:8d3:1319:8a2e:370:7348]
The domain localhost
can be used if the browser considers the context is safe (especially the IP address corresponds to a local address)
The Relying Party ID should be determined depending on the common URLs for your web application.
If you have a web application that can be reached at https://m.my-app.com (for mobiles) and https://my-app.com or https://www.my-app.com (for other devices), your Relying Party ID should be my-app.com
.
If the domain is shared between sub-projects, the rp ID should be limited to that sub-projects.
For example, a web site is located at https://(www.)site1.host.com
and another at https://(www.)site2.host.com
, then the Relying Party IDs should be site1.host.com
and site2.host.com
respectively. If you set host.com
, there is a risk that users from site1.host.com
can log in at site2.host.com
.
Discussion is ongoing for associating authenticators to multiple RP IDs such as my-company.com
, meine-firma.de
et ma-compagnie.fr
Your application may also have a logo. You can indicate this logo as third argument. Please note that for safety reason this icon is a priori authenticated URL i.e. an image that uses the data
scheme.
The Webauthn specification does not set any limit for the length of the third argument.
The icon may be ignored by browsers, especially if its length is greater than 128 bytes.
Authenticator details and how to manage them
After the registration of an authenticator, you will get a Public Key Credential Source object. It contains all the credential data needed to perform user authentication and much more:
The credential ID,
The public key,
The credential type (public_key
),
The transports (USB
, NFC
, BLE
, internal
),
The attestation type,
The trust path,
The authenticator AAGUID,
The user handle (i.e. the user ID)
The authenticator counter,
Other UI data
...
Since 4.6.0 and except if you use the Symfony bundle, there is no interface to implement or abstract class to extend so that it should be easy to integrate it in your application.
Whatever database you use (MySQL, pgSQL…), it is not necessary to create relationships between your users and the Credential Sources.
To set up a Webauthn server, you'll require components from two main categories:
: serivces required to load the data and convert into DTO or other objects
: services required to verify the input data and return the result of this validation
Upon completion, you'll have the capability to and .
You will interact with the authenticators through an HTML page and Javascript using the Webauthn API.
We highly recommend the use of . This library provides lots of easy and useful features and it fully compliant with the specification.
If you use the Symfony UX, you may be interested in the .
Note that is mandatory to use the HTTPS scheme to use Webauthn otherwise it will not work. This is also mandatory for localhost
.
This page is about an advanced feature. You can skip it if you are new with Webauthn
Disclaimer: you should not ask for the Attestation Statement unless you want to play with it or you are working on an application that requires a high level of trust (e.g. Banking/Financial Company, Government Agency...).
During the Attestation Ceremony (i.e. the registration of the authenticator), you can ask for the Attestation Statement of the authenticator. The Attestation Statements have one of the following types:
None (none
): no Attestation Statement is provided
Basic Attestation (basic
): Authenticator’s attestation key pair is specific to an authenticator model.
Surrogate Basic Attestation (or Self Attestation - self
): Authenticators that have no specific attestation key use the credential private key to create the attestation signature
Attestation CA (AttCA
): Authenticators are based on a Trusted Platform Module (TPM). They can generate multiple attestation identity key pairs (AIK) and requests an Attestation CA to issue an AIK certificate for each.
Anonymization CA (AnonCA
): Authenticators use an Anonymization CA, which dynamically generates per-credential attestation certificates such that the attestation statements presented to Relying Parties do not provide uniquely identifiable information.
The Metadata Statements are issued by the manufacturers of the authenticators. These statements contain details about the authenticators (supported algorithms, biometric capabilities...) and all the necessary information to verify the Attestation Statements generated during the attestation ceremony.
There are several possible sources to get these Metadata Statements. The main source is the that allows fetching statements on-demand, but some of them may be provided by other means.
The FIDO Alliance Metadata Service provides a limited number of Metadata Statements. It is mandatory to get the statement from the manufacturer of your authenticators otherwise the Attestation Statement won't be verified and the Attestation Ceremony will fail.
It's all about users
A User Entity object represents a user in the Webauthn context. It has the following constraints:
The user ID must be unique and must be a string,
The username must be unique,
Hereafter a minimalist example of user entity:
The username can be composed of any displayable characters, including emojis. Username "😝🥰😔" is perfectly valid.
Developers should not add rules that prevent users from choosing the username they want.
For privacy reasons, it is not recommended using the e-mail as username.
As for the rp
Entity, the User Entity may have an icon. This icon must also be secured.
The Webauthn specification does not set any limit for the length of the icon.
The icon may be ignored by browsers, especially if its length is greater than 128 bytes.
Except if you use the Symfony bundle, there is no interface to implement or abstract class to extend so that it should be easy to integrate it in your application. You may already have a user repository.
Whatever database you use (MySQL, pgSQL…), it is not necessary to create relationships between your users and the Credential Sources.
In general, the data you receive is an encoded JSON object. The library provides utilities to convert the string into objects.
To do so, you will need an Attestation Statement Support Manager and a Serializer.
Authenticator Responses may contain an Attestation Statement. This attestation holds data regarding the authenticator depending on several factors such as its manufacturer and model, what you asked in the options, the capabilities of the browser or what the user allowed.
The following attestation types are supported. Note that you should only use the none
one unless you have specific needs described in .
none
: no attestation is provided.
fido-u2f
: for non-FIDO2 compatible devices (old FIDO / U2F security tokens).
packed
: generally used by authenticators with limited resources (e.g. secure elements). It uses a very compact but still extensible encoding method.
android key
: commonly used by old or disconnected Android devices.
android safety net: for new Android devices like smartphones (deprecated).
trusted platform module
: for devices with built-in security chips.
apple
: for Apple devices
To convert Authenticator Responses from the encoded string to an object, you will need a Serializer. It only needs the Attestation Statement Support Manager created above.
Before 4.8.0, you were asked to create a PublicKeyCredentialLoader object. For 4.8.0, you can use a Symfony Serializer object. This will become the standard way to load data for 5.0.0.
In general, the data you receive looks like as follows.
Only this type of input is supported. If you receive other forms of data, please contact us.
If the data is correctly loaded, the variable $publicKeyCredential
will be an instance of Webauthn\PublicKeyCredential
. An exception is thrown in case of an error.
At this stage, the data is not verified.
The loaded data needs to be verified. The library will perform several actions to make sure the input you received is valid. This verification process is performed by a Ceremony Step Manager (CSM). The Webauthn Specification distinguish two types of ceremonies described in this page.
To facilitate the creation of the CSM, a default factory is included. This factory requires no external services to function.
You can customize its behavior to fit the specific needs of your application by modifying the provided factory. Please refer to the dedicated pages for more information.
These CSM services are meant to be used by Response Validators. On a similar way, there are two types of validators:
Authenticator Attestation Response Validator: used during the creation ceremony
Authenticator Assertion Response Validator: used during the request ceremony
The Authenticator Attestation Response Validator and Authenticator Assertion Response Validator services are directly used when receiving Authenticator Responses in order to register authenticators or authenticate users.
All null values below correspond to deprecated parameters. They will be removed in 5.0.0
During this step, your application will send a challenge to the device. The device will resolve this challenge by adding information and digitally signing the data.
The application will check the response from the device and get its credential ID. This ID will be used for further authentication requests.
To associate a device to a user, you need to instantiate a Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
object.
It will need:
The Relying Party
The User data
A challenge (random binary string)
A list of supported public key parameters i.e. an algorithm list (at least one)
Optionally, you can customize the following parameters:
A timeout
A list of public key credential to exclude from the registration process
The Authenticator Selection Criteria
Attestation conveyance preference
Extensions
Let’s see an example of the PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
object. The following example is a possible Public Key Creation page for a dummy user "@cypher-Angel-3000".
The options object can be converted into JSON and sent to the authenticator using the API.
It is important to store the user entity and the options object (e.g. in the session) for the next step. The data will be needed to check the response from the device.
You can change the default values for each and all options
The argument pubKeyCredParams
contains a list of Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialParameters
objects that refer to COSE algorithms. The authenticators must use one of the algorithms in this list, respecting the order of preference on this list.
An empty list corresponds to the default algorithms that are ES256
and RS256
(in this order). Those two algorithms are required by the specification.
Customizing this list may lead to unexpected behavior. Please use with caution.
Please read detail on this page.
Please read detail on this page.
When the user already registered authenticators, you can pass a list of Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor
objects as argument to avoid registering multiple times the same authenticator.
What you receive must be a JSON object that looks like as follow:
There are two steps to perform with this object:
Now that all components are set, we can load the data we receive using the Serializer (variable $serializer
).
If no exception is thrown, you can go to the next step: the verification.
Now we have a fully loaded Public Key Credential object, but we need now to make sure that:
The authenticator response is of type AuthenticatorAttestationResponse
This response is valid.
The first step is easy to perform:
The second step is the verification against
The Public Key Creation Options we created earlier,
The URI host
The Authenticator Attestation Response Validator service (variable $authenticatorAttestationResponseValidator
) will check everything for you: challenge, origin, attestation statement and much more.
If no exception is thrown, the response is valid. You can store the Public Key Credential Source ($publicKeyCredentialSource
).
The way you store and associate these objects to the user is out of scope of this library. Please note that these objects implement \JsonSerializable
and have a static method createFromJson(string $json)
. This will allow you to serialize the objects into JSON and easily go back to an object.
During this step, your application will send a challenge to the list of registered devices of the user. The security token will resolve this challenge by adding information and digitally signing the data.
To perform a user authentication using a security device, you need to instantiate a Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions
object.
Let’s say you want to authenticate the user we used earlier. This options object will need:
A challenge (random binary string)
The list with the allowed credentials (may be an option in certain circumstances)
Optionally, you can customize the following parameters:
A timeout
The Relying Party ID i.e. your application domain
The user verification requirement
Extensions
The PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions
object is designed to be easily serialized into a JSON object. This will ease the integration into an HTML page or through an API endpoint.
The timeout default value is set to null
. If you want to set a value, pleaase read the following recommended behavior showed in the specification:
If the user verification is discouraged
, timeout should be between 30 and 180 seconds
If the user verification is preferred
or required
, the range is 300 to 600 seconds (5 to 10 minutes)
The user trying to authenticate must have registered at least one device. For this user, you have to get all Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor
associated to his account.
For usernameless authentication, please read the dedicated page. In this case no Public Key Credential Descriptors should be passed to the the options.
Eligible authenticators are filtered and only capable of satisfying this requirement will interact with the user. Please refer to the User Verification page for all possible values.
Please refer to the Extension page to know how to manage authentication extensions.
The way you receive this response is out of scope of this library. In the previous example, the data is part of the query string, but it can be done through a POST request body or a request header.
What you receive must be a JSON object that looks like as follows:
There are two steps to perform with this object:
This step is exactly the same as the one described in Public Key Credential Creation process.
Now we have a fully loaded Public Key Credential object, but we need now to make sure that:
The authenticator response is of type AuthenticatorAssertionResponse
This response is valid.
The first is easy to perform:
The second step is the verification against the Public Key Assertion Options we created earlier.
The Authenticator Assertion Response Validator service (variable $authenticatorAssertionResponseValidator
) will check everything for you.
If no exception is thrown, the response is valid and you can continue the authentication of the user.
If you have troubles during the development of your application or if you want to keep track of every critical/error messages in production, you can use a PSR-3 compatible logger.
Several classes implement the interface Webauthn\MetadataService\CanLogData
. This interface allows setting a PSR-3 logger instance.
By default, any type of authenticator can be used by your users and interact with you application. In certain circumstances, you may need to select specific authenticators e.g. when user verification is required.
The Webauthn API and this library allow you to define a set of options to disallow the registration of authenticators that do not fulfill with the conditions.
The class Webauthn\AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria
is designed for this purpose. It is used when generating the Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
object.
You can indicate if the authenticator must be attached to the client (platform authenticator i.e. it is usually not removable from the client device) or must be detached (roaming authenticator).
Possible values are:
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::AUTHENTICATOR_ATTACHMENT_NO_PREFERENCE
: there is no requirement (default value),
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::AUTHENTICATOR_ATTACHMENT_PLATFORM
: the authenticator must be attached,
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::AUTHENTICATOR_ATTACHMENT_CROSS_PLATFORM
: must be a roaming authenticator.
A primary use case for platform authenticators is to register a particular client device as a "trusted device" for future authentication. This gives the user the convenience benefit of not needing a roaming authenticator, e.g., the user will not have to dig around in their pocket for their key fob or phone.
With this criterion, a Public Key Credential Source will be stored in the authenticator, client or client device. Such storage requires an authenticator capable to store such a resident credential.
A resident key shall be created you want to .
With this example, with require the user verification (PIN, fingerprint...), a resident key and an authenticator embedded onto a device. This is typacally what you will require for Windows Hello or Face ID authentication.
With Webauthn, it is possible to authenticate a user without username. This behavior implies several constraints:
During the registration of the authenticator, a ,
The user verification is required,
The list of allowed authenticators must be empty
In case of failure, you should continue with the standard authentication process i.e. by asking the username of the user.
Selection criteria for the registration of the authenticator:
The Request Options:
The default values for the user verification and the resident key are set to preferred and resident keys may be created if the authenticator is compatible. This means that some users may log in without username.
The authenticators may have an internal counter. This feature is very helpful to detect cloned devices.
The default behaviour is to reject the assertions. This behaviour might cause some troubles as it could reject the real device whilst the fake one can continue to be used.
It is therefore required to go deeper in the protection of your application by logging the error and locking the associated account.
To do so , you have to create a custom Counter Checker and inject it to your Authenticator Assertion Response Validator. The checker must implement the interface Webauthn\Counter\CounterChecker
.
The Counter Checker service can be injected to your Ceremony Step Manager Factory.
The Webauthn data verification is based on cryptographic signatures and thus you need to provide cryptographic algorithms to perform those checks.
The following algorithms are required in most situations:
The order is important. By adding ES256
first, the relyaing party prefers an ES256
credential. Browsers are eager to satisfy preferences.
The complete list of supported algorithms:
The algorithm manager can be injected to your Ceremony Step Manager Factory.
The following example is totally fictive. We will add an extension input loc=true
to the request option object.
An Extension Output Checker (EOC) will check the extension output.
It must implement the interface Webauthn\AuthenticationExtensions\ExtensionOutputChecker
and throw an exception of type Webauthn\AuthenticationExtension\ExtensionOutputError
in case of error.
Devices may ignore the extension inputs. The extension outputs are therefore not guaranteed.
In the previous example, we asked for the location of the device and we expect to receive geolocation data in the extension output.
You can create as many EOC as needed. These services can be managed by a handler that will be injected to the Ceremony Step Manager Factory. Extensions will be automatically verified during the validation steps.
Important Notice: The request for an Attestation Statement is reserved for applications necessitating a high degree of reliability, such as those operated by banking or financial institutions, government agencies, etc. Exercise caution and ensure your application's context requires such a level of trust before proceeding.
There are few steps to acheive. First, you have to add support classes for all attestation statement types into your Attestation Metatdata Manager.
For 4.5.0, the TPMAttestationStatementSupport
class accepts a PSR-20 clock as argument. This argument will be mandatory for 5.0.0.
In the example below, we use symfony/clock
component.
It is not described on this page, but available in the previous versions of the documentation.
Then, you must prepare an Metadata Statement Repository. This service will manage all Metadata Statements depending on their sources (local storage or distant service).
Your Metadata Statement Repository must implement the interface Webauthn\MetadataService\MetadataStatementRepository
that has only one method:
findOneByAAGUID(string $aaguid)
: this method retrieves the MetadataStatement
object with AAGUID. It shall return null
in case of the absence of the MDS.
The library does not provide any Metadata Statement Repository. It is up to you to select the MDS suitable for your application and store them in your database.
To prevent the use of rogue MDS or deprecated by the manufacturers, Status Reports may be used. The Status Report Repository is a simple service that implements the interface Webauthn\MetadataService\StatusReportRepository
with a unique method:
findStatusReportsByAAGUID(string $aaguid)
: this method returns a list of Status Reports for the given AAGUID.
The verification's success or failure depends on the state reported in the most recent Status Report.
When an attestation statement is received, a certificate chain is constructed. This chain combines certificates from the Metadata Service (MDS), which are trusted, with those provided by the authenticator, which are untrusted.
By default, no Attestation Statement is asked to the Authenticators (type = none
). To change this behavior, you just have to set the corresponding parameter in the Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
object.
There are 3 conveyance modes available using PHP constants provided by the class Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
:
ATTESTATION_CONVEYANCE_PREFERENCE_NONE
: the Relying Party is not interested in authenticator attestation (default)
ATTESTATION_CONVEYANCE_PREFERENCE_INDIRECT
: the Relying Party prefers an attestation conveyance yielding verifiable attestation statements, but allows the client to decide how to obtain such attestation statements.
ATTESTATION_CONVEYANCE_PREFERENCE_DIRECT
: the Relying Party wants to receive the attestation statement as generated by the authenticator.
.
The Android SafetyNet Attestation API is deprecated. Full turndown is planned in June 2024. More information at
The Certificate Chain Validator is responsible for this task. The library provides the class Webauthn\MetadataService\CertificateChain\PhpCertificateChainValidator
that requires a Symfony Http Client () and a PSR-20 Clock.
The services described above must be set to the . The CSM you will create will verifiy the attestation statement sent by the authenticator.
This framework provides a Symfony bundle that will help you to use the components within your Symfony application.
Implementations for other frameworks and web applications exist.
As an example if you use Laravel, you may be interested in this project: https://github.com/asbiin/laravel-webauthn
As the recipes are third party ones not officially supported by Symfony, you will be asked to execute the recipe or not. When applied, the recipes will prompt a message such as WebAuthn Framework is ready.
If you don't use Symfony Flex, you must register the bundle and route manually.
The first steps are:
The creation of your Credential Source repository
The creation of your User Entity repository.
You may also want to configure the other options offered by the bundle. Please refer to the configuration references.
Now you have a fully configured bundle, you can protect your routes and manage the user registration and authenticatin through the Symfony Firewall.
If your are working on a development environment, https
may not be available but the context could be considered as secured. You can bypass the scheme verification by passing the list of rpIds you consider secured.
Please be careful using this feature. It should NOT be used in production.
Where the public keys and details are stored
The Credential Source can be stored the way you want. As the Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialSource
class can be converted into JSON, it could be stored in a filesystem.
It is up to you to create a credential source repository. This service shall implement Webauthn\Bundle\Repository\PublicKeyCredentialSourceRepositoryInterface
.
By default, the User Entity Repository is not able to register any user account. You can add this behaviour by implementing the interface Webauthn\Bundle\Repository\CanRegisterUserEntity
.
In general, Symfony applications use Doctrine. That is why the bundle provides a way to use Doctrine as storage system.
Hereafter an example of an entity.
This is the most simple example. Feel free to add custom fields that fits on your needs e.g. created_at
or is_revoked
.
Do not forget to update your database schema!
To ease the integration into your application, the bundle provides a concrete class that you can extend.
In this following example, we extend that class and add a method to get all credentials for a specific user handle. Feel free to add your own methods.
We must override the method saveCredentialSource
because we may receive Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialSource
objects instead of App\Entity\WebauthnCredential
.
This repository should be declared as a Symfony service.
With Symfony autowiring and autoconfiguration, this is usually done automatically
How to register and authenticate my users?
To authenticate or register your users with Symfony, the best and easiest way is to use the Security Bundle. First, install that bundle and follow the instructions given by the official documentation.
At the end of the installation and configuration, you should have a config/packages/security.yaml
file that looks like as follow:
To enable the user authentication, you just have to declare the webauthn authenticator if the appropriate firewall (here main
).
As you have noticed, there is nothing to configure to have a fully functional firewall. The firewall routes are automatically created for you. They are namely:
/login/options
: to create the request options (POST
only)
/login
: to submit the assertion response (POST
only)
If you need, you can customize those endpoints.
By default, the default
profile is used (see request_profiles
in the Configuration References). You may have created a request profile in the bundle configuration. You can use this profile instead of the default one.
The user registration can also by managed by the firewall. It is disabled by default. If you want that feature, please enable it:
The firewall routes are automatically created for you. They are namely:
/register/options
: to create the creation options (POST only)
/register
: to submit the attestation response (POST only)
You should also ensure to allow anonymous users to contact those endpoints.
The security token returned by the firewall sets some attributes depending on the assertion and the capabilities of the authenticator. The attributes are:
IS_USER_PRESENT
: the user was present during the authentication ceremony. This attribute is usually set to true
by authenticators,
IS_USER_VERIFIED
: the user was verified by the authenticator. Verification may be performed by several means including biometrics ones (fingerprint, iris, facial recognition…).
You can then set constraints to the access controls. In the example below, the /admin path can be reached by users with the role ROLE_ADMIN
and that have been verified during the ceremony.
You can customize the responses returned by the firewall by using a custom handler. This could be useful when you want to return additional information to your application.
There are 4 types of responses and handlers:
Request options: options returned during the authentication ceremony,
Creation options: options returned during the registration ceremony,
Authentication Success,
Authentication Failure,
This handler is called when a client sends a valid POST request to the options_path
during the authentication process. The default Request Options Handler is Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\DefaultRequestOptionsHandler
. It returns a JSON Response with the Public Key Credential Request Options objects in its body.
Your custom handler has to implement the interface Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\RequestOptionsHandler
and be declared as a service.
When done, you can set your new service in the firewall configuration:
This handler is very similar to the previous one, except that it is called during the registration of a new user and has to implement the interface Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\CreationOptionsHandler
.
This handler is called when a client sends a valid assertion from the authenticator. The default handler is Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\DefaultSuccessHandler
.
Your custom handler has to implement the interface Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticationSuccessHandlerInterface
and be declared as a container service.
When done, you can set your new service in the firewall configuration:
This handler is called when an error occurred during the authentication process. The default handler is Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\DefaultFailureHandler
.
Your custom handler has to implement the interface Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Authentication\AuthenticationFailureHandlerInterface
and be declared as a container service.
When done, you can set your new service in the firewall configuration:
With Flex, you have a minimal configuration file installed through a Flex Recipe. You must set the repositories you have just created. You also have to modify the environment variables Relying_PARTY_ID
and Relying_PARTY_NAME
.
You may also need to adjust other parameters.
If you don’t use Flex, hereafter an example of configuration file:
If you don't create the creation_profiles
section, a default
profile is set.
The relying Party corresponds to your application. Please refer to this page for more information.
The parameter id
is optional but highly recommended.
By default, the length of the challenge is 32 bytes. You may need to select a smaller or higher length. This length can be configured for each profile:
The default timeout is set to 60 seconds (60 000 milliseconds). You can change this value as follows:
For v4.0+, the timeout is set to null
. The values recommended by the specification are as follow:
If the user verification is discouraged
, timeout should be between 30 and 180 seconds
If the user verification is preferred
or required
, the range is 300 to 600 seconds (5 to 10 minutes)
These behaviors are not necessarily followed by the web browsers.
This set of options allows you to select authenticators depending on their capabilities. The values are described in the advanced concepts of the protocol.
This option indicates the algorithms allowed for your application. By default, a large list of algorithms is defined, but you can add custom algorithms or reduce the list.
The order is important. Preferred algorithms go first.
It is not recommended changing the default list unless you exactly know what you are doing.
If you need the attestation of the authenticator, you can specify the preference regarding attestation conveyance during credential generation.
The use of Attestation Statements is generally not recommended unless you REALLY need this information.
You can set as many extensions as you want in the profile. Please also refer to this page for more information.
The example below is totally fictive. Some extensions are defined in the specification but the support depends on the authenticators, on the browsers and on the relying parties (your applications).
If you don't create the creation_profiles
section, a default
profile is set.
The parameters for the request profiles (i.e. the authentication) are very similar to the creation profiles. The only difference is that you don’t need all the detail of the Relying Party, but only its ID (i.e. its domain).
Please note that all parameters are optional. The following configuration is perfectly valid. However, and as mentioned above, the parameter id
is highly recommended.
In some circumstances, you may need to register a new authenticator for a user e.g. when adding a new authenticator or when an administrator acts as another user to replace a lost device.
It is possible to perform this ceremony programmatically.
You can attach several authenticators to a user account. It is recommended in case of lost devices or if the user gets access on your application using multiple platforms (smartphone, laptop…).
With a Symfony application, the fastest way for a user to register additional authenticators is to use the “controller” feature.
To add a new authenticator to a user, the bundle needs to know to whom it should be added. This can be:
The current user itself e.g. from its own account
An administrator acting for another user from a dashboard
For that purpose, a User Entity Guesser service should be created. This service shall implement the interface Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Guesser\UserEntityGuesser
and its unique method findUserEntity
.
You can directly use the Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Guesser\CurrentUserEntityGuesser
as a Symfony service. It is designed to identify the user that is currently logged in.
In the example herafter where the current user is guessed using a controller parameter. This can be used when an administrator is adding an authenticator to another user account.
In the case the current user s supposed to be administrator, the user entity can be determined using the query parameters and a route like /admin/add-authenticator/for/{user_id}
.
Now you just have to enable the feature and set the routes to your options and response controllers.
As the user shall be authenticated to register a new authenticator, you should protect these routes in the security.yaml
file.
Now you can send requests to these new endpoints. For example, if you are using the Javascript library, the calls will look like as follow:
You can customize the responses returned by the controllers by using custom handlers. This could be useful when you want to return additional information to your application.
There are 3 types of responses and handlers:
Creation options,
Success,
Failure.
This handler is called during the registration of a authenticator and has to implement the interface Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\CreationOptionsHandler
.
This handler is called when a client sends a valid assertion from the authenticator. This handler shall implement the interface Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\SuccessHandler
. The default handler is Webauthn\Bundle\Service\DefaultSuccessHandler
.
This handler is called when an error occurred during the process. This handler shall implement the interface Webauthn\Bundle\Security\Handler\SuccessHandler
. The default handler is Webauthn\Bundle\Service\DefaultFailureHandler
.
Your application certainly has a user repository. Good news: there is no need to modify it!
The User Entity Repository can be completely decoupled from the user entity used by your application.
This repository should be declared as a Symfony service and shall implement Webauthn\Bundle\Repository\PublicKeyCredentialUserEntityRepositoryInterface
.
Hereafter an example where the application User Repository is injected. This repository uses Doctrine and provides findOneBy*
methods.
By default, the User Entity Repository is not able to register any user account. You can add this behaviour by implementing the following interfaces:
Webauthn\Bundle\Repository\CanRegisterUserEntity
Webauthn\Bundle\Repository\CanGenerateUserEntity
If you have troubles during the development of your application or if you want to keep track of every critical/error messages in production, you can use a .
The easiest way to manage the user verification requirements in your Symfony application is by using the creation and request profiles.
Disclaimer: you should not ask for the Attestation Statement unless you are working on an application that requires a high level of trust (e.g. Banking/Financial Company, Government Agency...).
With Symfony, you must enable this feature and define a Metadata Statement Repository in the configuration file.
The modification of these parameters is not recommended. You should try to sync your server clock first.
By default, no Attestation Statement is asked to the Authenticators (type = none
). To change this behavior, you just have to set the corresponding parameter in the Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
object.
There are 3 conveyance modes available using PHP constants provided by the class Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
:
ATTESTATION_CONVEYANCE_PREFERENCE_NONE
: the Relying Party is not interested in authenticator attestation (default)
ATTESTATION_CONVEYANCE_PREFERENCE_INDIRECT
: the Relying Party prefers an attestation conveyance yielding verifiable attestation statements, but allows the client to decide how to obtain such attestation statements.
ATTESTATION_CONVEYANCE_PREFERENCE_DIRECT
: the Relying Party wants to receive the attestation statement as generated by the authenticator.
ATTESTATION_CONVEYANCE_PREFERENCE_ENTERPRISE
: the Relying Party wants to receive uniquely identifying information from authenticators.
The default
is used. You can change it using the dedicated option.
If your are working on a development environment, https
may not be available but the context could be considered as secured. You can bypass the scheme verification by passing the list of rpIds you consider secured.
Please be careful using this feature. It should NOT be used in production.
An Extension Output Checker will check the extension output.
It must implement the interface Webauthn\AuthenticationExtensions\ExtensionOutputChecker
and throw an exception of type Webauthn\AuthenticationExtension\ExtensionOutputError
in case of error.
Devices may ignore the extension inputs. The extension outputs are therefore not guaranteed.
In the previous example, we asked for the location of the device and we expect to receive geolocation data in the extension output.
The easiest way to manage that is by using the creation and request profiles.
By default, any type of authenticator can be used by your users and interact with you application. In certain circumstances, you may need to select specific authenticators e.g. when user verification is required.
The Webauthn API and this library allow you to define a set of options to disallow the registration of authenticators that do not fulfill with the conditions.
The class Webauthn\AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria
is designed for this purpose. It is used when generating the Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialCreationOptions
object.
You can indicate if the authenticator must be attached to the client (platform authenticator i.e. it is usually not removable from the client device) or must be detached (roaming authenticator).
Possible values are:
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::AUTHENTICATOR_ATTACHMENT_NO_PREFERENCE
: there is no requirement (default value),
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::AUTHENTICATOR_ATTACHMENT_PLATFORM
: the authenticator must be attached,
AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::AUTHENTICATOR_ATTACHMENT_CROSS_PLATFORM
: must be a roaming authenticator.
A primary use case for platform authenticators is to register a particular client device as a "trusted device" for future authentication. This gives the user the convenience benefit of not needing a roaming authenticator, e.g., the user will not have to dig around in their pocket for their key fob or phone.
When this criterion is set to true
, a Public Key Credential Source will be stored in the authenticator, client or client device. Such storage requires an authenticator capable to store such a resident credential.
This criterion is needed if you want to authenticate users without username.
To be written
The authenticators may have an internal counter. This feature is very helpful to detect cloned devices.
The default behaviour is to reject the assertions. This might cause some troubles as it could reject the real device whilst the fake one can continue to be used. You may also want to log the error, warn administrators or lock the associated user account.
To do so , you have to create a custom Counter Checker and inject it to your Authenticator Assertion Response Validator. The checker must implement the interface Webauthn\Counter\CounterChecker
.
The following example is fictive and show how to lock a user, log the error and throw an exception.
With Webauthn, it is possible to authenticate a user without username. This behavior implies several constraints:
During the registration of the authenticator, a Resident Key must have been asked,
The user verification is required,
The list of allowed authenticators must be empty
In case of failure, you should continue with the standard authentication process i.e. by asking the username of the user.
The bundle configuration should have a profile with the constraints listed above:
Step-by-step guide for migrating from v3.x to v4.0
This project follows the Semantic Versioning principles and, contrary to upgrade a minor version (where the middle number changes) where no difficulty should be encountered, upgrade a major version (where the first number changes) is subject to significant modifications.
First of all, you have to make sure you are using the last v3.x release (v3.3.4 at the time of writing).
In addition, you have to make sure you are using PHP 8.1+
.
If you use the Symfony bundle and Symfony Flex, please note that Flex Recipes are now provided through a dedicated server.
It is highly recommended to declare this server within your application composer.json
file.
You can adapt this command line depending on the other Flex servers you are using.
Next, you have to verify you don’t use any deprecated class, interface, method or property. If you have PHPUnit tests, you can easily get the list of deprecation used in your application.
The class Webauthn\Server
is removed and there is no replacement.
The Metadata Statement embraces the version 3 of the specification. There is no migration tool to convert the MDS from v2 to v3. We suggest to refer to this blog post from Yuriy Ackermann, a Fido Alliance staff member who regulary write articles on Webauthn.
Added:
symfony/http-client ^6.0
symfony/uid ^6.0
Bumped:
spomky-labs/cbor-php
minimal version is now ^3.0
spomky-labs/cbor-bundle
minimal version is now ^3.0
symfony
components minimal version is now ^6.0
symfony/psr-http-message-bridge
minimal version is now ^2.0
thecodingmachine/safe minimal version is now ^2.0
Removed:
sensio/framework-extra-bundle
ramsey/uuid
As the bundle sensio/framework-extra-bundle
is not required anymore, the associated configuration may become useless if you do not use this bundle in your project.
The most notable changes are related to the Metadata Statement section
It is now time to upgrade the libraries. In your composer.json, change all web-auth/*
dependencies from v3.x
to v4.0
. When done, execute composer update
.
This may also update other dependencies. You can list upgradable libraries by calling composer outdated
. Please make sure these libraries do not impact your upgrade.
If you want to see all modifications at once, please have a look at this page.
Step-by-step guide for migrating from 4.x to 5.0
This page is subject to changes as the version 5.0.0 is not available at the time of writing.
This project follows the Semantic Versioning principles and, contrary to upgrade a minor version (where the middle number changes) where no difficulty should be encountered, upgrade a major version (where the first number changes) is subject to significant modifications.
First of all, you have to make sure you are using the last 4.x release (4.8.0 at the time of writing).
In addition, you have to make sure you are using PHP 8.3+
.
Next, you have to verify you don’t use any deprecated class, interface, method or property. If you have PHPUnit tests, you can easily get the list of deprecation used in your application.
In previous versions, the classes that requires time used the PHP time function directly. It is now required to use a PSR-20 Clock implementation and pass it to the classes.
Webauthn\MetadataService\CertificateChain\PhpCertificateChainValidator
For version 3.2.0+ and the Symfony Bundle, an internal implementation service named jose.internal_clock
existed and is removed.
All references to token binding are deprecated. This functionality is not supported anymore as removed from the latest Webauthn spectification versions.
All references to the ECDAA Attestation Statement type are deprecated. This functionality is not supported anymore as removed from the latest Webauthn spectification versions.
Constant AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::RESIDENT_KEY_REQUIREMENT_NONE
: please use AuthenticatorSelectionCriteria::RESIDENT_KEY_REQUIREMENT_NO_PREFERENCE
instead
This class is now deprecated. Please use Webauthn\MetadataService\CertificateChainChecker\PhpCertificateChainValidator
instead or a class that implements Webauthn\MetadataService\CertificateChain\CertificateChainValidator
.
This class is removed in 5.0. You should use Symfony Serializer or create a dedicated serializer using Webauthn\Denormalizer\WebauthnSerializerFactory
.
This interface is deprecated and removed. There is no replacement as it became useless for the library. The Symfony bundle uses its own interface Webauthn\Bundle\Repository\Webauthn\Bundle\Repository
you are asked to use in the Symfony context.
The PSR-17 and PSR-18 are not supported anymore. The library uses Symfony Http Client instead. A class is provided to help you to continue using PSR-* compatible libraries: Webauthn\MetadataService\Psr18HttpClient
. This class is very basic and can be enhanced or overridden at will.
The following events are removed in favor of events located in the library namespace:
Webauthn\Bundle\Event\AuthenticatorAssertionResponseValidationFailedEvent
Webauthn\Bundle\Event\AuthenticatorAssertionResponseValidationSucceededEvent
Webauthn\Bundle\Event\AuthenticatorAttestationResponseValidationFailedEvent
Webauthn\Bundle\Event\AuthenticatorAttestationResponseValidationSucceededEvent
The following services are removed:
webauthn.cose.algoritm.*
(because of a typo)
Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialLoader
Webauthn\PublicKeyCredentialSourceRepository
Webauthn\TokenBinding\IgnoreTokenBindingHandler
Webauthn\TokenBinding\SecTokenBindingHandler
Webauthn\TokenBinding\TokenBindingNotSupportedHandler
Added:
symfony/clock
symfony/serializer
symfony/property-access
symfony/property-info
phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock
Bumped:
PHP
: >=8.3
symfony/*
: ^7.0
Removed:
lcobucci/clock
The following options are removed:
webauthn.http_message_factory
webauthn.token_binding_support_handler
webauthn.creation_profiles[x].attachment_mode
When deprecations are removed, you can upgrade the libraries. In your composer.json, change all web-auth/*
dependencies from ^4.x
to ^5.0
. When done, execute composer update
.
This may also update other dependencies. You can list upgradable libraries by calling composer outdated
. Please make sure these libraries do not impact your upgrade.
If you want to see all modifications at once, please have a look at this page.
The Symfony UX Initiative allows adding high interaction application from Twig templates without a single line of JS.
With the version 4.1, a Stimulus Controller is provided. This component turns a basic login form into a Webauthn compatible one.
To use this nice feature, you first need to install and configure Symfony UX. Please refer to the official documentation.
Then, install the package using composer:
It is now time to create your first form.
Consider the following login form.
First step is to remove the password field that is no longer needed. In addition, we can indicate the autocomplete method is webauthn
; this helps browser understanding the purpose of this field.
We now have only two Twig functions to call: stimulus_controller
and stimulus_action
.
The first one is placed on the form
level;
The latter on the button
.
The Stimulus Controller should be configured to fits on your needs. In particular, the routes to the options and authenticator result. The route names used below are automatically created by the firewall from the bundle package. By using these values, we make sure the routes are always in line with the firewall configuration.